<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin &#8211; A Bridge to Nowhere  &#8211; Energy, Climate, and the Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environment/</link>
	<description>News, Resources, and Commentary on Climate Change, Energy, and Sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:00:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Schueneman</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environment/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schueneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environmental/#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>John,

I understand that you&#039;re likely a lost cause, but I will ask again. Can you cite your sources? &quot;Under my nimminy piminey nose&quot;? Aren&#039;t you embarrassed to sound like a 6-year-old? 

I&#039;ll make this simple: for starters 2005 and 2007. Maybe 2003. Is that simple enough for you?

If you&#039;re willing to actually pry open your mind a bit and consider a real discussion of the point you claim is &quot;right under my nose&quot; and a &quot;tap dance&quot;, then there are sources that do not concur with your assertion (that you have yet to cite) that you may want to at least look at. I can actually come up with the sources upon which you are likely asserting this point, why can&#039;t you even do that much? 

The thing is I&#039;ve studied this a little bit John. I&#039;ve seen points for and against this. I could argue this with myself and do a better job than to try to discuss it with you. It&#039;s tiring to deal with people that are unable or unwilling to support their viewpoint. 

Just read the thousand or so blog posts here, or better yet, go to the Academy of Sciences, the NOAA&#039;s climate project, NASA, or any number of scientific organizations to see where I&#039;m getting my information. You should at least be able to cite the heartland institute or something - I mean really, where do you get your information? Did you go out and do the science? If you can&#039;t cite a source or offer something beyond childish gibberish, than you need to ask yourself, &quot;why would anyone listen to what I have to say?&quot;

Please, if you want to have a discussion about this, try to let go of your mysterious rage and discuss the issue like an adult. Otherwise you&#039;re wasting your time and my time. I can assure you, you won&#039;t change anyone&#039;s mind with the powers of argumentation you&#039;ve displayed thus far.   

Okay John, it&#039;s up to you. You can let this lie, you can come back with a source and ask a legitimate question, or you can fire back with mindless rage. It&#039;s up to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I understand that you&#039;re likely a lost cause, but I will ask again. Can you cite your sources? &#034;Under my nimminy piminey nose&#034;? Aren&#039;t you embarrassed to sound like a 6-year-old? </p>
<p>I&#039;ll make this simple: for starters 2005 and 2007. Maybe 2003. Is that simple enough for you?</p>
<p>If you&#039;re willing to actually pry open your mind a bit and consider a real discussion of the point you claim is &#034;right under my nose&#034; and a &#034;tap dance&#034;, then there are sources that do not concur with your assertion (that you have yet to cite) that you may want to at least look at. I can actually come up with the sources upon which you are likely asserting this point, why can&#039;t you even do that much? </p>
<p>The thing is I&#039;ve studied this a little bit John. I&#039;ve seen points for and against this. I could argue this with myself and do a better job than to try to discuss it with you. It&#039;s tiring to deal with people that are unable or unwilling to support their viewpoint. </p>
<p>Just read the thousand or so blog posts here, or better yet, go to the Academy of Sciences, the NOAA&#039;s climate project, NASA, or any number of scientific organizations to see where I&#039;m getting my information. You should at least be able to cite the heartland institute or something &#8211; I mean really, where do you get your information? Did you go out and do the science? If you can&#039;t cite a source or offer something beyond childish gibberish, than you need to ask yourself, &#034;why would anyone listen to what I have to say?&#034;</p>
<p>Please, if you want to have a discussion about this, try to let go of your mysterious rage and discuss the issue like an adult. Otherwise you&#039;re wasting your time and my time. I can assure you, you won&#039;t change anyone&#039;s mind with the powers of argumentation you&#039;ve displayed thus far.   </p>
<p>Okay John, it&#039;s up to you. You can let this lie, you can come back with a source and ask a legitimate question, or you can fire back with mindless rage. It&#039;s up to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john B</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environment/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>john B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environmental/#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Ok, Thomas... My sources are under your nimminy piminey nose.  Look at the data. A simple question that you won&#039;t answer without a tap dance..  What year since 1998 has been warmer? Check the facts. I&#039;ll give you a hint.. NONE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Thomas&#8230; My sources are under your nimminy piminey nose.  Look at the data. A simple question that you won&#039;t answer without a tap dance..  What year since 1998 has been warmer? Check the facts. I&#039;ll give you a hint.. NONE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Schueneman</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environment/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schueneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-a-bridge-to-nowhere-energy-climate-and-the-environmental/#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Stop the craziness indeed John. Thanks for bringing up the latest fad of a myth - and here we go again. (Feel free to cite your sources, re: FACT CHECK)

http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/21/debunking-the-myth-global-warming-stopped-in-1998/

Oh, and John, your little preamble shows how little you know about climate science in any case. Fact check indeed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop the craziness indeed John. Thanks for bringing up the latest fad of a myth &#8211; and here we go again. (Feel free to cite your sources, re: FACT CHECK)</p>
<p><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/21/debunking-the-myth-global-warming-stopped-in-1998/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/21/debunking-the-myth-global-warming-stopped-in-1998/</a></p>
<p>Oh, and John, your little preamble shows how little you know about climate science in any case. Fact check indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
